Write an Action Scene Without Using Explicit Movement Verbs

Narrative action scenes present an engaging platform for writers to demonstrate both technical prowess and imaginative flexibility. These sequences, often characterised by swift, high-stakes events, traditionally lean heavily on explicit movement verbs such as “run,” “strike,” or “leap.” However, deliberately excluding such direct indicators compels the writer to adopt a more nuanced approach, focusing on indirect cues, sensory detail, and the implications of physical exertion rather than overt descriptions of motion.

The Rationale Behind Avoiding Explicit Movement Verbs

At first glance, omitting standard action verbs might seem counterproductive. After all, verbs like “dashed” or “swung” offer immediate clarity. Yet, this restriction pushes the narrative into a more sophisticated territory. By circumventing direct movement descriptors, a writer can:

• Enhance Immersion: Readers engage more fully with the text when they deduce motion from context and sensory cues.

• Increase Originality: Eliminating common action words forces inventive phrasing and fresh perspectives.

• Deepen Atmosphere: Emphasising environmental and emotional responses over explicit motion enriches the overall texture of the scene.

This technique moves beyond simple storytelling mechanics, requiring a more deliberate and analytical approach to scene construction.

Methodological Strategies for Conveying Action Without Direct Verbs

1. Leveraging Sensory Input

Motion, at its core, is inferred through sensory changes. A character’s breathing quickens, muscles tense, or the ground shifts beneath their feet—such details suggest action without stating it outright. For example, rather than writing, “She sprinted across the bridge,” consider:

The wind rushed past her face, a relentless battering force. Each step jarred her knees, the planks beneath her trembling with the strain.

The reader perceives motion as a consequence of environmental and physical sensations. This method not only conveys the act but also intensifies the reader’s engagement by layering sensory experiences.

2. Focusing on Environmental Interaction

Objects within the scene can signal action. Instead of saying, “He punched the wall,” describe the wall’s response:

The plaster gave way under his knuckles, a sharp crack echoing through the empty corridor.

Through this lens, the environment becomes a dynamic participant, reflecting the character’s force and intent. The narrative gains a tactile quality, with each element contributing to the perception of motion and intensity.

3. Emphasising Cause and Effect

Rather than directly stating what a character does, illustrate what results from their actions. Consider this progression:

• Glass splinters cascade across the floor.

• A figure stumbles backward, a sharp intake of breath audible in the silence.

• A table shudders, its legs scraping against the tile.

The reader deduces that a physical confrontation has occurred. This cause-and-effect sequence anchors the scene, guiding the reader through a chain of events that imply movement without ever naming it.

4. Utilising Character Responses

Dialogue, internal thoughts, and physical reactions provide a vivid tapestry of action. Instead of writing, “She dodged the blow,” let her reaction tell the story:

“Not so fast!” she shouted, ducking low as the rush of displaced air brushed her cheek.

The character’s reaction—both verbal and physical—communicates the action. Readers feel the immediacy of the moment through the protagonist’s perspective, enriching their connection to the unfolding drama.

5. Adjusting Pacing Through Sentence Structure

Sentence length and rhythm can mirror the tempo of the scene. Rapid, fragmented sentences heighten tension, while longer, flowing phrases allow a moment’s pause or reflection. By varying pacing, the narrative ebbs and flows in a way that mirrors cinematic editing:

• A single breath. A quick glance. The unmistakable sound of a gun’s hammer clicking back.

• Time stretched thin as he watched the door creak open, each inch revealing more shadows.

These shifts in structure and rhythm replicate the urgency or suspense of an action scene without depending on direct movement descriptors.

6. Integrating Subtext and Implied Motion

Readers are adept at filling in gaps. They do not require every motion spelled out. Instead, hint at movements through changes in position, shifts in dialogue cadence, or alterations in the environment. For instance, you don’t need to say, “He jumped out of the way.” You can write:

A sudden shift, his view now obscured by the overturned table. The faint scent of scorched wood lingered where he had just stood.

Through subtle details and strategic omissions, the reader infers the action, making the scene feel more active and involving.

Advanced Considerations for Omitting Explicit Verbs

While these techniques encourage deeper engagement and creativity, they also demand a careful balance. Over-reliance on sensory or environmental details can slow pacing or lead to overly ornate prose.

Similarly, ambiguous implications may confuse readers if the causal chain is not clear. As such, writers must maintain a vigilant editorial approach, ensuring that each implied action is discernible and contributes meaningfully to the narrative.

By refining these strategies—leveraging sensory cues, focusing on cause and effect, utilising environmental responses, and adjusting narrative rhythm—authors can craft action scenes that are both compelling and intellectually satisfying.

These scenes move beyond surface-level descriptions, presenting a richer, more layered approach to conveying intensity and motion.

Enjoyed this article? Subscribe to our newsletter for more writing insights and share this with fellow storytellers!